Examine This Report on case law on section 395 ppc convictions
Examine This Report on case law on section 395 ppc convictions
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
The focus is around the intention to cause injury. This can be a major problem: a very low threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.
4. It has been noticed by this Court that there can be a delay of at some point from the registration of FIR which has not been explained because of the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness in the alleged incidence plus the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of the petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened being the real brothers on the deceased but they didn't respond in the least on the confessional statements on the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not appear much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is no explanation concerning why her arrest wasn't effected after making in the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on a lot of instances that extra judicial confession of the accused is often a weak sort of evidence which could be manoeuvred through the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution is additionally counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain click here and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word as to existence of some light on the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners with each other with a motorcycle at 4.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal guidance or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed into the court in which the case has been or will be filed.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
This is because transfer orders are typically considered within the administrative discretion from the employer. However, there can be exceptions in cases where the transfer is determined by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They might have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more
only within the ground of miscases remanded & only over the ground of misreading of evidence only about the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to stick to.
This system, for use by members on the Virginia State Bar and their designated staff, allows electronic filing of most civil cases in circuit court.
Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, and case law at both the federal and state levels.
Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and balance. It demonstrates the commitment of the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of legislation.
one. Judicial Independence: The court emphasized the importance of judicial independence plus the separation of powers.
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition on the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Advancement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court read the matter as being a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) on the Pakistan Constitution presents original jurisdiction to the Supreme Court to take up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
Finding reliable free case regulation sites is usually challenging. Many websites involve subscriptions or offer limited information. This article helps you navigate the landscape of free case legislation resources in Pakistan, supplying you with a curated list of reliable and accessible platforms.